A successful attorney malpractice action by me against my attorney (Christopher Aiello) was improperly reversed on appeal, proving that lawyer misconduct is protected by higher courts in domestic relations and other cases. My attorney, Mr. Aiello, committed attorney malpractice by allowing an original and two amendments of the “Consent Judgment of Annulment” to be entered without client consent and when it was non-conforming to the settlement agreement placed on the divorce court’s record under oath, June 3, 1997, and the record is replete with financial discovery Mr. Aiello should have achieved in Macomb County Circuit Court. I incurred $100,000 in legal fees and costs due to having to have counsel try to fix the errors created by Mr. Aiello. My trial costs exceeded $220,000, and the state appellate courts improperly reversed the attorney malpractice trial. Attorney Aiello then unlawfully collected and liquidated ($38,813.19 and $41,803.70= $80,616.89) in my individual retirement accounts (IRA) for taxed trial costs, in violation of holdings in the 2005 U.S. Supreme Court decision of Rousey v. Jacoway, and Florida retirement statute exemptions 222.14 and 221.21.  

ATTORNEY MALPRACTICE TRIAL:

(a) VOID/NO CONSENT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT/(3) JUDGMENTS and WRONG PER COURT TRANSCRIPT

  August 17, 2001: Judge Templin, Oakland County Circuit Court, lawyer malpractice proceedings the cross-examination by Aiello’s own attorney, Mr. Geyer:

• GEYER: Your Honor, for the purpose of speeding things up, I’ll stipulate that the clients did not sign either amendment.
• COURT: Okay.
• HENRY: Or the original.
• GEYER: Or the original.HENRY: Thank you, I’ll accept the stipulation, then.

August 20, 2001: Judge Templin, Oakland County Circuit Court, Lawyer Malpractice Trial (Aiello): 

• McKINNEY: Did your client rely on your professional judgment when you’re presenting her case?
• AIELLO: No.

August 24, 2001: Judge Templin, Oakland County Circuit Court, Lawyer Malpractice Trial (Aiello):

• McKINNEY: What did you do? You were presented with a problem as an attorney.
• AIELLO: Bailed out of the case.
• McKINNEY: How long have you been a lawyer?
• AIELLO: Probably too long.
• McKINNEY: You’re suggesting you got unsigned copies (financials) and you did nothing about it?
• AIELLO: I was fired. I was gone one month later. I was done. I was out of the case. Thank God. I got out of the case.

(b) PARENTAL ALIENATION: August 22, 2001: Judge Templin, Oakland County Circuit Court, Lawyer Malpractice Trial Aiello: 

• PERAKIS (drafted one-sided settlement): Because Mr. Aiello has made prior errors, which precluded her from having visitation with her daughter… She couldn’t be with her daughter, that’s it exactly.

(c) NO ACCURATE FINANCIAL DISCOVERY BY AIELLO, SUBPOENAED FINANCIAL TRIAL EXHIBITS  BY MY ATTORNEY, MR. HENRY:

1994–1997: Financial Trial Exhibit Z:  Analysis and Financial Summary of Bill’s Suburban, Inc., (Edward M. Hannaford): John F. Dery, CPA, CFE, CIRA the accounting firm specializing in litigation and forensic accounting, provided Hannaford’s business analysis and financial summary for the base years of 1994–1997, with findings of a net profit of $2,023,999 on adjusted gross receipts from Hannaford’s corporate federal tax returns.

1988–1996: Hannaford Trial Exhibit DD: Macomb County Circuit Court, Case # 88-4945-DM, Divorce Stipulation:  Hannaford paid his first wife $1,600 per month: $150 per week in child support and $1,000 per month in a property settlement.

APRIL 15, 1992: My filing with the Friend of the Court, “Complaint about Child Support and Restitution” (against Hannaford): Macomb County Friend of the Court awarded Christine during a brief separation, $58 per week in child support (per child support guidelines?).   August 24, 2001: Judge Templin, Oakland County Circuit Court, Lawyer Malpractice Trial (Aiello): 

• HENRY: I am handing you what is marked as proposed Exhibit KK (1993: 1120 U.S. Corporate Short-Form Income Tax Return $253,725), and ask if you can identify this document, yes or no.
• HANNAFORD: 1993? I thought this was limited.
• HENRY: It’s not.

1994: Hannaford Financial Trial Exhibits:

• Trial Exhibit X: 1040 U.S. Individual Income Tax Return: $17,350: Friend of the Court File.
• Trial Exhibit Y: 1040 U.S. Individual Income Tax Return Reported to IRS: $42,350.
• Trial Exhibit KK: 1120-U.S. Corporate Short-Form Income Tax Return Reported to IRS: $253,725.

1995: Hannaford Financial Trial Exhibits:

• Trial Exhibit II: W-2 Wage and Tax Return: $24,800: Friend of the Court file.
• Trial Exhibit LL: 1120 -U.S. Corporate Short-Form Income Tax Return Reported to IRS: $297,777.

1996: Hannaford Financial Trial Exhibits:

January 3, 1996: Friend of the Court Final Recommendation, by Lori Swidorski, Support Investigator: “Said investigation would indicate that Hannaford’s weekly income amounts to $404.66.”

• 1040 U.S. Individual Income Tax Return: $24,800: Friend of the Court file.
• Trial Exhibit NN: 1120 -U.S. Corporate Short-Form Income Tax Return: $327,717.
• 1997: Hannaford Financial Trial Exhibits:
• Trial Exhibit JJ: W-2 Wage and Tax Statement: $42,126.
• Trial Exhibit: 1120 -U.S. Corporate Short-Form Income Tax Return: $343,588.

THE STATE APPELLATE COURT IMPROPERLY REVERSED THE AIELLO ATTORNEY MALPRACTICE TRIAL: Judge Mester: Oakland County Circuit Court Orders:

• June 16, 2004: Bench Warrant for failure to appear at creditors examination, this Court ordered: The arrest of Defendant, Christine Morrison with a cash bond in the amount of $36,000 shall be posted for her release.
• February 9, 2005: Court order Ex-Parte: Ex-Parte Motion to Reinstate Bench Warrant. THE WARRANT WAS EX PARTE, SO I WAS UNAWARE OF ITS EXISTENCE. AN APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OR HABEAS CORPUS COULD NOT HAVE BEEN DRAFTED AND FILED PRIOR TO UNLAWFUL DETENTION.
• November 21, 2005: Order to Set Aside Bench Warrant: Judgment against Christine Morrison has been paid in full including costs and interest.

QUESTION: ENDANGERMENT/ TERROR/BOUNTY HUNTERS?

Fact # 1: After being prosecuted for attempted murder (shooting his uncle several times in broad daylight …), Hannaford was acquitted (book p. 48).  Fact #2: Around 2004- 2005, I (and passenger) was chased on roads in Macomb County by a black SUV/dark windows, assume for the above Judge Mester bench warrant -cash bond of $36,000 for failure to appear at creditors exam (Aiello/attorney malpractice trial/NO CONSENT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT).  Fact #3:  Around 2008, neighbors noticed an unknown male parked in a car down my street.  I assume it was a process server (November 18, 2008, Judge Yokich) who came to my address and was told I was not there. He left and went to the neighbor’s house asking for my whereabouts, pulling a gun at the neighbor.

 JANUARY 13, 2011: CALIFORNIA LEGALIZED ATTORNEY MALPRACTICE, in the Supreme Court decision, Cassel v. Superior Court.  Professor Richard Zitrin of UC Hastings has written:(http://www.clrc.ca.gov/pub/2016/MM16-60s1.pdf): The Cassel case leads to an absurd result-one that allows lawyers to be sloppy, negligent, and incompetent without cost to them, and even worse, to cheat their clients with impunity.

QUESTIONS: While the corrupt, color of law attorneys orchestrating the Crimes against Humanity in the (Family) Courts are flourishing by making a business of stealing our rights, lives, property and assets.  We lose our livelihood and careers by being legally embroiled in courts seeking futile remedy. We are falsely arrested, maliciously prosecuted and criminalized by being defamed and accused of the very crimes being perpetrated by the (Family) Court Regime as a diversion from their Crimes against Humanity. We become embroiled in never-ending staged, fraudulent litigation orchestrated by (Family) Court wherein we are forced in other collusion courts seeking remedy for Crimes against Humanity from accomplish, conspiring color of law judges?

February 17, 2021: Brennan Center Events “America’s Broken Legal System” Judge Jed Rakoff https://www.brennancenter.org/events/americas-broken-legal-system  Ninety % represent themselves in the housing or family court are not represented by lawyers. And the statistics show those who are represented by lawyers, do far better than those who are not (?) 

 Questions: The “U.S. Injustice System” is not broken?  Does it work perfectly for the government career employees who run and benefit from it? Is it impenetrable by design and cannot be fixed?  Could it not exist but for the fact it is intentionally kept in place by the government employees in each branch for their own financial benefit and power? Has the “U.S. Injustice System” been set up to have no consequences for acts of Crimes against Humanity by the self-created, illegal, delusional, fictitious notion of “immunity” that is used as a sword and shied to delude the public that government employees can perpetrate their crimes with impunity? 

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-  827/187951/20210819171109624_Brief%20of%20Amici%20Curiae%20ISO%20Respondents.pdf  The government should not be able to use the state secrets privilege as both a sword and a shield. Political embarrassment is not an acceptable reason to shield state secrets.